Jeremy H. G. Hayes, a candidate for District 16 Wilson County Commission and advocate for sustainable growth, has expressed his desire to see development around District 16 in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee, slowed down until the necessary infrastructure is in place to accommodate the increased traffic. His concerns reflect the growing tension between rapid development that many communities are experiencing and the essential need for supporting infrastructure to handle the pressures of such growth. Hayes’ position is rooted in a desire to protect the quality of life in the area, maintain safety standards, and ensure that Mt. Juliet remains a livable community for current and future residents.
Mt. Juliet has become one of the fastest-growing cities in Tennessee in recent years. As new businesses, housing developments, and commercial projects continue to spring up, the region’s population has increased substantially. While economic growth and expansion bring benefits such as job creation and improved amenities, Hayes argues that the current pace of development is outpacing the community’s ability to provide the infrastructure necessary to support it.
One of Hayes’ main concerns is the impact of increased traffic on the roads, particularly in District 16. Central Pike, which runs through this area, is already a dangerous road, struggling to handle the volume of traffic it currently sees. The road is narrow, lacks sufficient lighting in some areas, and has limited shoulders, making it hazardous for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists. Given that Central Pike is a critical route for residents and commuters alike, Hayes warns that adding thousands of more cars per day—from new developments—could turn the road into a nightmare. Traffic accidents, congestion, and safety concerns would only escalate if the necessary infrastructure upgrades aren’t made.
Without proper investment in transportation infrastructure—such as road widening, additional lanes, and improved intersections—traffic congestion will worsen, leading to longer commute times, increased accidents, and a general decline in the area’s livability. Hayes argues that until these critical infrastructure needs are met, further development should be paused, as it would only exacerbate the existing problems.
Slowing development would allow time for a thorough analysis of the traffic situation and the implementation of necessary improvements to Central Pike and other key roads in District 16. Hayes believes that ensuring the roads and public services are prepared for the increase in demand would not only alleviate traffic but also prevent the quality of life from deteriorating. He emphasizes the importance of having a balanced approach to development, one that doesn’t rush to build more homes and businesses without taking the time to develop a comprehensive plan to address the growing needs of the community.
Furthermore, Hayes is concerned about the potential environmental impact of unchecked growth. More development often means more impervious surfaces like roads and parking lots, which can exacerbate stormwater runoff and lead to flooding in areas that were not previously prone to it. Without adequate stormwater management systems in place, District 16 could face significant environmental challenges in the near future.
There are also public safety concerns tied to the lack of adequate infrastructure. Emergency response times could be significantly impacted if roads become congested, which could delay crucial services during a fire, medical emergency, or natural disaster. Hayes has been vocal about the need to prioritize these safety issues by ensuring the infrastructure is ready for the inevitable increase in traffic before more people move in.
By calling for a pause in development, Hayes is advocating for a thoughtful, responsible approach to growth that doesn’t sacrifice the well-being of current and future residents for the sake of rapid expansion. His call to slow development in District 16 until the necessary infrastructure is in place reflects a desire to ensure that the city’s growth is sustainable, safe, and manageable in the long term. He believes that without addressing these infrastructure issues first, the co-risks compromising its future, and it’s essential to strike a balance between progress and preparation.